Drainage basin changes affect runoff into coral reefs. Forest clearance increases sediment, freshwater runoff, and land-based pollutants. These can cause reef die-off in downstream areas.
Dams alter the amount and timing of freshwater flow, disrupting ecosystems that rely on seasonal freshwater inputs for their life cycle.
Onshore development affects reefs directly (dredging for ship channels) and indirectly (mangrove clearance increases sediment and nutrients).
Too much sediment limits light for photosynthesis. Increased nutrients can be toxic and cause algal blooms that smother corals.
Key principle: Land-use changes in drainage basins have downstream marine impacts. Integrated management of catchment and coast is essential.
Natural impacts: Extreme rain (freshwater dilution), storm waves (physical damage), volcanic activity (ash smothering, magma), tidal changes (low tide exposes coral to UV and drying; prolonged high tide restricts light).
Marine predation: Crown-of-thorns starfish and other predators can damage reefs when populations explode. Natural impacts rarely destroy entire reefs; recovery usually occurs over time.
Climate change: Warming oceans cause thermal stress and bleaching. Rising sea levels increase sedimentation. Storm patterns change (stronger, more frequent). Altered currents affect food supply and larval dispersal.
Ocean acidification: Increased CO2 lowers pH, restricting growth and structural integrity of coral skeletons.
Cumulative stress: When reefs face continuous stress (natural or human), recovery capacity is overwhelmed and polyps die. Mass bleaching events are becoming more frequent, giving less time for recovery.
| Threat Type | Examples | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| Direct physical | Anchoring, touching, blast fishing | Immediate structural damage |
| Water quality | Pollution, sediment, nutrients | Light blocked, toxicity, algal blooms |
| Climate | Warming, acidification | Bleaching, weakened skeletons |
| Biological | Overfishing algae-eaters | Algae smother corals |
Local vs global threats: Pollution (local) can be addressed by catchment management; climate change (global) requires international action. Both contribute to reef decline.
Acute vs chronic: Blast fishing causes acute damage; chronic pollution and warming cause gradual decline. Combined effects are often synergistic.
Restriction of fishing: Limit catches, especially protected species. Commercial fishing fees can fund research, education, and reef management.
Tourism: Ecotourism can support conservation; reef monitoring and reporting by tourists can aid management. Sustainable practices (no touching, no anchoring on reef) reduce damage.
Water quality: Governments, farmers, and industry working together to limit pollutants from land. Reef trusts can improve water quality and habitats.
Education: Local communities monitoring and protecting reefs while maintaining livelihoods. Reporting changes enables early intervention.
Limitation: Local management is effective but does not tackle global climate change and sea-level rise. Evaluation should include both positive conservation strategies and ongoing challenges.
Exam tip: When evaluating future prospects, include both threats and management strategies. Do not focus only on negatives.
Always distinguish threat types: Physical (anchoring, blast), chemical (pollution, acidification), biological (overfishing, predation).
Link causes to mechanisms: e.g. warming → thermal stress → bleaching → zooxanthellae expelled → coral death.
Include management when asked to evaluate: restriction of fishing, pollution control, education, reef trusts.
Case study: Great Barrier Reef for bleaching events and catchment management (e.g. Queensland runoff).
Balance: Acknowledge that local conservation strategies can be effective but do not address global climate change.
Links to Coral Reef Ecosystems (anatomy, zooxanthellae, environmental conditions) and climate change (ocean warming, acidification, storm patterns).
Drainage basin management connects to fluvial geomorphology and land-use planning.