Self-Efficacy refers to an individual's confidence in their ability to successfully carry out an aggressive action to achieve a desired outcome.
High self-efficacy in aggression is built through past successes; if a person has successfully used aggression to solve problems before, they are more likely to use it again.
This concept explains why some individuals choose aggression while others do not, even if both have observed the same models.
| Feature | Traditional Behaviorism | Social Learning Theory |
|---|---|---|
| Learning Source | Direct experience/Trial and error | Observation of others |
| Role of Cognition | Ignored (Black Box) | Essential (Mediational processes) |
| Reinforcement | Must be direct | Can be vicarious (indirect) |
| Timing | Immediate response | Can be delayed (latent learning) |
Focus on Mediators: When explaining SLT, always list and define the four mediational processes, as these are the "cognitive" part of the theory that examiners look for.
Evaluation Points: Use the distinction between reactive aggression (impulsive) and proactive aggression (calculated) to critique the theory; SLT explains proactive aggression better.
Nature vs. Nurture: Position SLT on the 'nurture' side of the debate, but note that it is less deterministic than behaviorism because it allows for cognitive choice.
Not just mimicry: A common mistake is thinking SLT is just simple copying; it actually involves complex cognitive evaluation of the model's consequences.
Ignoring Biology: Students often forget that SLT doesn't deny biological urges but focuses on how those urges are channeled and expressed through social learning.
Confusing Reinforcement: Ensure you distinguish between vicarious reinforcement (watching others) and direct reinforcement (experiencing it yourself).