| Type | Cause | Behavioral Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Weak | Absent/Uninvolved parent | Impulsive, amoral, Id-driven acts |
| Deviant | Criminal/Immoral parent | Offending perceived as normal/moral |
| Over-harsh | Excessively strict parent | Guilt-driven; seeks punishment |
Identify the Mechanism: When discussing the Superego, always specify which type (Weak, Deviant, or Over-harsh) applies to the scenario provided.
Evaluate the Evidence: Be prepared to critique Bowlby's research by mentioning researcher bias (he conducted the interviews himself) and the distinction between deprivation (loss) and privation (never having a bond).
Scientific Status: A common exam point is that psychodynamic concepts like the 'unconscious' are unfalsifiable, meaning they cannot be empirically tested or proven wrong.
The 'Good' Misconception: Students often think an 'Over-harsh' Superego prevents crime because the person is 'too good.' In reality, the theory suggests it causes crime through a subconscious desire for punishment.
Correlation vs. Causation: In Bowlby's studies, maternal deprivation is correlated with delinquency, but it does not prove that deprivation caused the behavior; other factors like poverty or genetics could be involved.
Gender Bias: Freud's theory suggests women have weaker Superegos because they don't experience castration anxiety, yet crime statistics show men are far more likely to offend, contradicting the theory's logic.