Design and Participants: The Method section must detail the experimental design (e.g., independent groups) and the sampling technique used. Information about the participants, such as age, gender, and how they were recruited, is vital for assessing the generalizability of the findings.
Apparatus and Procedure: Every piece of equipment or standardized test used must be listed to ensure the study can be mirrored. The procedure is a step-by-step 'recipe' of exactly what happened to the participants from the moment they arrived until they left, including the standardized instructions given.
Ethics: A statement must be included explaining how ethical guidelines were met. This typically covers informed consent, protection from harm, and debriefing procedures.
Results: This section presents the findings using descriptive statistics (means, standard deviations) and inferential statistics (statistical tests, p-values). It focuses purely on what the data shows without offering any subjective interpretation or explanation for why the results occurred.
Discussion: Here, the researcher interprets the results in the context of the hypotheses and previous research mentioned in the introduction. It also addresses the limitations of the study, such as potential confounding variables, and suggests real-world applications or future research directions.
| Section | Primary Focus | Content Type |
|---|---|---|
| Results | Objective Data | Tables, graphs, and statistical significance levels (). |
| Discussion | Subjective Interpretation | Explanations, limitations, and theoretical implications. |
| Abstract | Overview | A brief 'snapshot' of every major section of the report. |
| Introduction | Rationale | The logical 'why' behind the study based on past literature. |
Check for Operationalization: When describing the introduction or hypotheses, always ensure variables are clearly defined and measurable. Examiners look for specific details rather than vague statements of intent.
The 'Replication Test': When writing or evaluating a Method section, ask yourself if a stranger could perform the study based only on your description. If details like the exact timing of a task or the specific wording of instructions are missing, the section is incomplete.
Avoid Interpretation in Results: A common mistake is explaining 'why' a result happened in the Results section. Keep the Results section strictly numerical and save the 'why' for the Discussion.
Reference Accuracy: Ensure that every source cited in the text appears in the reference list and vice versa. Inconsistent referencing is a frequent source of lost marks in academic reporting.