Critique of Rationalism: Oakeshott argued that modern politics is plagued by 'Rationalism,' the mistaken belief that political activity can be governed by technical rules and abstract blueprints.
Technical vs. Practical Knowledge: He distinguished between Technical Knowledge (rules that can be written down) and Practical Knowledge (skills and wisdom acquired through experience and tradition).
Politics as Navigation: Oakeshott used the metaphor of a ship at sea: the goal of politics is not to reach a specific destination (a utopia) but to keep the ship afloat and steady in a 'boundless and bottomless' ocean.
The Conservative Disposition: He described conservatism not as a set of dogmas, but as a 'disposition' to prefer the familiar to the unknown, the tried to the untried, and the actual to the possible.
Reactionary Thought: Unlike Burke's evolutionary approach, Maistre was a reactionary who sought to restore the absolute authority of the monarchy and the Catholic Church following the French Revolution.
Throne and Altar: He believed that social order was impossible without the dual pillars of religious authority and political absolutism to restrain the inherently sinful nature of man.
The Executioner as a Pillar of Society: Maistre argued that the fear of punishment and the presence of authority were the only things preventing society from descending into chaos and violence.
| Feature | Traditional Conservatism | New Right / Libertarian Conservatism |
|---|---|---|
| View of Society | Organic, interconnected 'little platoons' | Collection of self-interested individuals |
| Economic View | Skeptical of free markets if they disrupt tradition | Radical support for free markets and deregulation |
| Role of State | Paternalistic; provides order and welfare | Minimalist; protects property and contracts |
| Change | Incremental and evolutionary | Can be radical in pursuit of economic efficiency |
Conservatism vs. Reactionaryism: While conservatives seek to preserve the best of the past while allowing for gradual change, reactionaries seek to 'turn back the clock' to a previous era entirely.
Pragmatism vs. Ideology: Conservatives generally pride themselves on being pragmatic and flexible, whereas ideologies like Socialism or Liberalism are often seen by conservatives as rigid and dogmatic.
Identify the Thinker: When analyzing a text, look for keywords like 'organic' or 'inheritance' (Burke), 'disposition' or 'rationalism' (Oakeshott), or 'authority' and 'sin' (Maistre).
Avoid the 'Anti-Change' Trap: Never argue that conservatives oppose all change. Instead, emphasize that they support incremental change to preserve the core of the institution.
Connect Human Nature to Policy: Always link conservative policies (like law and order or support for the family) back to the core belief in human imperfection.
Distinguish from Fascism: Ensure you clarify that traditional conservatism values established institutions (like law and religion) to limit power, whereas fascism often seeks to subvert those institutions to the will of a leader.