| Core idea | Agreement | Disagreement |
|---|---|---|
| Ecology | Respect natural systems | Deep green: radical limits; Shallow green: reform; Social ecology: capitalism causes commodification |
| Holism | Importance of holistic thinking | Deep green: prioritise natural systems; Shallow green: balance with human priorities; Eco-feminism: mechanistic view stems from patriarchy |
| Environmental ethics | Ethical duties to environment | Deep green: prioritise non-human interests; Shallow green: balance with human benefit |
| Consciousness | Foundation for protection | Deep green: radical awareness; Shallow green: technological reform; Eco-feminism: new relationship with nature |
| Sustainability | Guiding principle | Deep green: radical limits; Shallow green: incremental reform |
Know the six core ideas: Ecology, holism, environmental ethics, environmental consciousness, post-materialism and anti-consumerism, sustainability. For each, understand both the shared principle and the strand-specific disagreements.
Key thinkers: Aldo Leopold (land ethic, stewardship), Rachel Carson (industrial impact, pesticides), Murray Bookchin (social structures, hierarchy), E.F. Schumacher (appropriate technology, anti-consumerism), Carolyn Merchant (mechanistic worldview, patriarchy).
Use ecocentrism vs anthropocentrism: Ecologism rejects anthropocentrism (humans above nature) and supports ecocentrism (nature has intrinsic value). This is a core distinction from other ideologies.
Misconception: Ecologism is only about recycling. Reality: Ecologism involves fundamental change in the human-nature relationship—ecology, holism, ethics, consciousness, post-materialism, and sustainability. It challenges growth-based economics and anthropocentrism.
Misconception: All ecologists agree on the role of government. Reality: Deep green argue the state under capitalism cannot deliver; shallow green rely on regulation; eco-anarchists favour decentralised communities. The role of government is contested.
Sustainability in practice: Governments can promote renewable and low-impact systems, but ecologists disagree on whether this is sufficient. Deep green argue radical limits are needed; shallow green support incremental reform.