1. Executive: Prerogative powers (treaty making, prorogation) allow action without parliamentary approval. This bypasses legislative scrutiny.
2. Supreme Court: Through interpretation of statutes and constraining executive action, the Court effectively shapes public policy. Concerns: judges are unelected; few checks on judicial power.
3. International treaties: Treaties bind future governments. UK policy-making operates within these frameworks. Exiting treaties is difficult (Brexit demonstrated this).
4. Devolved bodies: Devolved institutions have primary legislative power over large policy areas. Policy differences exist across the UK. Challenges: West Lothian Question, tension over parliamentary sovereignty.
5. International organisations: NATO, UN, Council of Europe place constraints on UK action, particularly regarding human rights.
6. People: Power exercised through elections, referendums, recall elections, petitions, media pressure. Public opinion has led to government U-turns (e.g. two-child benefit cap).
| Legal sovereignty | Political sovereignty |
|---|---|
| Where the law says authority resides | Where power lies in practice |
| Parliament (UK) | Contested: executive, courts, devolved, people |
| Can make and unmake any law | May be exercised by other institutions |
Overall judgement: Sovereignty in the UK today is flexible and shared. Parliamentary sovereignty remains the core location of sovereignty. Parliament remains the home of legal sovereignty. Political sovereignty is more negotiated and dispersed.
When to emphasise Parliament: legal sovereignty, formal authority, legislative supremacy. When to emphasise others: agenda control (executive), judicial review (courts), devolved power, referendum conventions (people).
Distinguish legal and political sovereignty clearly. Examiners expect this distinction.
Use specific examples for each claimant: Parliament Acts, Miller cases, Scottish Gender Recognition Act veto, Brexit referendum, prerogative powers.
Balance the debates: present arguments for and against each claimant. Do not conclude that sovereignty has simply shifted to one place.
Overall judgement: Sovereignty is flexible and shared; Parliament remains legally sovereign; political sovereignty is dispersed. This balanced conclusion is often expected.
Misconception: Sovereignty has completely moved from Parliament. Reality: Parliament remains legally sovereign. The debate is about political sovereignty in practice, which may be dispersed.
Misconception: Referendums undermine parliamentary sovereignty. Reality: Referendums are not legally binding and can only be called by Parliament. They may place political pressure on Parliament but do not legally override it.
Misconception: One institution clearly holds all sovereignty. Reality: The overall judgement is that sovereignty is flexible and shared, with Parliament at the core of legal sovereignty.