It is critical to distinguish between Species Richness (the count of types) and Species Evenness (how equal the populations of those types are).
| Feature | Species Richness | Species Evenness |
|---|---|---|
| Focus | Number of different species | Relative abundance of each species |
| Sensitivity | High for rare species | High for dominant species |
| Complexity | Low (Simple count) | High (Requires population data) |
An Index of Diversity (like Simpson's or Shannon's) combines both richness and evenness into a single value to provide a more accurate measure of ecosystem health.
When comparing two habitats in an exam, always check if the total number of individuals is provided; if one habitat has more species but is dominated by just one of them, it may be less 'diverse' despite having higher 'richness'.
Remember that species richness is a qualitative count, whereas an index of diversity is a quantitative calculation; never use the terms interchangeably in long-answer questions.
If a question asks why richness might be low in a managed environment (like a farm), focus on factors like monoculture, the removal of hedgerows, and the use of pesticides which eliminate niches.
A common mistake is assuming that high species richness always indicates a 'healthy' ecosystem; for example, a site heavily invaded by many non-native species might have high richness but low ecological integrity.
Students often forget that richness is highly dependent on sampling effort; a larger sample size will almost always yield a higher richness count simply because rare species are more likely to be encountered.
Do not confuse richness with abundance; abundance refers to the total number of individuals of a single species, while richness refers to the number of different species types.