What is the difference between inter-cultural and intra-cultural variation in attachment?

Inter-cultural variation refers to differences in attachment patterns between different countries or cultures. Intra-cultural variation refers to differences found within the same country, which Van Ijzendoorn found to be 1.5 times greater than inter-cultural differences.

How do attachment patterns typically differ between individualist and collectivist cultures?

Individualist cultures (e.g., USA, Germany) tend to have higher rates of Insecure-Avoidant attachment due to a focus on independence. Collectivist cultures (e.g., Japan, Israel) show higher rates of Insecure-Resistant attachment, reflecting a focus on proximity and group belonging.

Why might the Strange Situation be considered an 'Imposed Etic' when used in Japan?

The Strange Situation was designed in the US and views infant distress upon separation as a sign of attachment. In Japan, where infants are rarely separated from mothers, the extreme distress observed may be a normal cultural reaction rather than a sign of 'insecure-resistant' attachment.

What is a common error when interpreting Van Ijzendoorn's findings regarding 'countries'?

A common error is assuming that a country represents a single uniform culture. In reality, countries contain many sub-cultures (e.g., urban vs. rural) that may have vastly different child-rearing practices and attachment distributions.

Why is it incorrect to conclude that German infants are 'less attached' because of higher avoidant scores?

In German culture, independence is a highly valued trait in children. What the Strange Situation labels as 'avoidance' may actually be the child demonstrating the independence and self-reliance encouraged by their parents.

What mistake do students often make when describing the 'most common' attachment type globally?

Students sometimes focus so much on the differences that they forget that Secure attachment is the most common type in every single culture studied, which is a crucial piece of evidence for the universality of attachment.

Define 'Meta-analysis' in the context of Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg's study.

A meta-analysis is a statistical technique that averages the results of many different studies (in this case, 32 studies from 8 countries) to reach an overall conclusion about a specific phenomenon.

What does the term 'Cultural Relativism' mean in attachment research?

It is the idea that behavior can only be meaningfully understood within the specific cultural context in which it occurs. It suggests that there is no single 'correct' way to raise a child or form an attachment.

What is an 'Individualist Culture'?

A culture that emphasizes personal achievement, autonomy, and independence over the needs and goals of the group. Examples include the United Kingdom and the United States.

Why does the high rate of secure attachment across all cultures support evolutionary theory?

If secure attachment is the norm everywhere, it suggests that forming a strong, responsive bond is an innate, biological drive that has evolved to ensure infant survival, regardless of environmental or cultural differences.

Library Podcasts

Courses

Referral & Rewards

Cultural Variations in Attachment: including Van Ijzendoorn

Summary

Cultural variations in attachment explore how child-rearing practices and societal norms influence the emotional bonds between infants and caregivers. The landmark meta-analysis by Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg (1988) established that while secure attachment is a near-universal norm, the distribution of insecure types varies significantly between individualist and collectivist societies.

1. Definition & Core Concepts

Cultural Variations: These refer to the differences in social behaviors and norms that exist between different human groups. In psychology, this focuses on how different upbringing styles affect the classification of attachment types.
Attachment Universality: This is the hypothesis that the biological drive to form an attachment is innate and present in all human cultures, regardless of specific parenting practices.
Cultural Norms: These are the shared expectations and rules that guide behavior within a group. For example, some cultures may prioritize early independence, while others emphasize constant physical proximity.

2. The Meta-Analysis Methodology

Meta-Analysis: This is a research technique that combines the results of multiple independent studies to identify overall trends. Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg analyzed 32 studies across 8 different countries, involving approximately 2,000 infants.
Standardized Assessment: All studies included in the meta-analysis utilized the Strange Situation procedure, ensuring that the criteria for 'Secure', 'Insecure-Avoidant', and 'Insecure-Resistant' were applied consistently across different global samples.
Inter-cultural vs. Intra-cultural: The researchers looked at differences between countries (inter-cultural) and differences within the same country (intra-cultural) to determine where the most significant variation occurred.

A bar chart comparing attachment types in Individualist vs Collectivist cultures. Individualist cultures show higher Insecure-Avoidant rates, while Collectivist cultures show higher Insecure-Resistant rates. Secure attachment remains the highest in both.

3. Key Findings & Global Patterns

4. Key Distinctions: Intra-cultural Variation

5. Methodological Critiques

6. Exam Strategy & Tips