| Feature | Majority Influence | Minority Influence |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Mechanism | Social Pressure / Power | Quality of Argument / Consistency |
| Psychological Process | Comparison (Surface) | Validation (Deep) |
| Outcome | Compliance (Public change) | Internalisation (Private change) |
| Speed of Change | Immediate / Rapid | Gradual / Slow |
Identify the Style: In exam scenarios, look for keywords like 'united front' (synchronic consistency), 'over a long period' (diachronic consistency), or 'taking risks' (augmentation principle).
Explain the 'Why': Don't just state that consistency is important; explain that it creates a 'war of attrition' that makes the majority doubt their own views and look more closely at the minority's stance.
Balance Consistency and Flexibility: If a scenario describes a minority that is failing because they are 'stubborn,' the answer usually involves a lack of flexibility. If they are failing because they 'keep changing their mind,' it is a lack of consistency.
Consistency vs. Rigidity: Students often confuse being consistent with being inflexible. Consistency refers to the message staying the same, while flexibility refers to the willingness to negotiate the details of how that message is implemented.
The Role of Numbers: It is a mistake to think that minority influence is about the size of the group. It is entirely about the behavioral style of the group; even a single individual can exert minority influence if they are consistent and committed.
Internalisation vs. Identification: Ensure you distinguish between internalisation (true belief) and identification (changing to be like a group). Minority influence specifically targets internalisation.