Feminists argue that social policies often reinforce patriarchal structures by assuming the 'normal' family is a nuclear one with a male breadwinner. For example, policies that offer limited paternity leave compared to maternity leave implicitly suggest that childcare is primarily a female responsibility.
Sociologist Drew identifies two types of gender regimes: familistic regimes, where policies base support on traditional gender roles (e.g., lack of state childcare), and individualistic regimes, where policies treat men and women as equal earners and caregivers (e.g., shared parental leave in Sweden).
Different political systems use family policy to achieve specific national goals. Totalitarian regimes often use extreme measures, such as China's former One-Child Policy to control population growth or Nazi Germany's pro-natalist policies which encouraged 'racially pure' families while sterilizing those deemed 'unfit'.
In democratic societies, the state generally avoids direct intervention unless there is evidence of abuse or neglect. However, even in these societies, the state 'steers' family life through incentives like tax breaks for married couples or subsidies for childcare, which subtly promote specific family models over others.
Analyze the 'Why': When discussing a policy, always link it to a sociological perspective. Don't just describe the policy; explain why a Functionalist would support it or why a Feminist would criticize it.
Use Comparative Examples: Contrast 'familistic' and 'individualistic' regimes to demonstrate a high-level understanding of how different cultural values shape state action.
Avoid Generalization: Remember that not all policies have the same effect on all families. A policy that helps a middle-class dual-earner family might have a neutral or even negative impact on a low-income lone-parent family.
Check for Bias: When evaluating the New Right, consider the counter-argument that cutting benefits may lead to increased poverty rather than increased independence.