| Feature | Hippocrates | Galen |
|---|---|---|
| Origin | Ancient Greece (5th Century BCE) | Ancient Rome (2nd Century CE) |
| Core Theory | Theory of the Four Humours | Theory of Opposites (Extension) |
| Methodology | Clinical Observation | Animal Dissection & Anatomy |
| Key Legacy | Hippocratic Oath & Diagnosis | Anatomical texts used for 1400 years |
Direct Observation vs. Anatomical Theory: While Hippocrates focused on outward symptoms, Galen sought to explain the internal functions of organs and nerves.
Human vs. Animal Anatomy: A critical distinction is that Galen's anatomical work was based on pigs and apes, leading to significant errors when applied to humans.
Continuity Focus: When discussing why these ideas lasted so long, always emphasize the support of the Christian Church, which saw Galen's 'creator' idea as compatible with faith.
Evaluation of Change: Be prepared to explain that medicine did not 'progress' during the medieval period because physicians were discouraged from questioning these ancient authorities.
Factor Analysis: Remember that the lack of scientific alternatives and the high status of education made it difficult for people to challenge Hippocrates and Galen.
Star Charts & Religion: Mention that medieval doctors often combined humoural theory with astrology (star charts) and religious prayer, showing how different factors intertwined.
The 'Medieval' Error: Students often mistake Hippocrates and Galen for medieval figures; they lived centuries before the Middle Ages began.
Dissection Confusion: Do not claim Galen dissected humans; he primarily dissected pigs, which explains why his theories about the human liver and heart were incorrect.
Theoretical Overlap: Avoid assuming the Theory of Opposites is the same as the Four Humours; the former is a specific treatment strategy based on the latter.