What is the primary difference between Knowledge of Results ($KR$) and Knowledge of Performance ($KP$)?

$KR$ relates to the final outcome or score of a performance, such as the time taken to finish a race. $KP$ relates to the quality or technique of the movement itself, such as the angle of the athlete's body during the start.

How do Intrinsic and Extrinsic feedback sources differ in origin?

Intrinsic feedback originates from within the performer's own senses, like the feeling of muscle tension. Extrinsic feedback comes from external sources, such as a coach's advice or a video analysis tool.

Compare the impact of Positive and Negative feedback on a beginner athlete.

Positive feedback is generally more effective for beginners as it builds motivation and encourages them to continue. Negative feedback can be demotivating for beginners if they do not yet have the resilience or basic skill set to process the criticism effectively.

What is a common error coaches make when providing feedback to beginners?

A common error is providing too much complex Knowledge of Performance ($KP$), which can lead to information overload. Feedback for beginners should be simple, extrinsic, and focused on providing a few clear instructions.

What mistake occurs when a performer ignores Intrinsic feedback as they progress?

By ignoring intrinsic feedback, the performer fails to develop a 'feel' for the skill, making them overly dependent on external guidance. This prevents them from reaching the autonomous stage where they can self-correct during a game.

Why is relying solely on Knowledge of Results ($KR$) often considered a strategic error in training?

Relying only on $KR$ tells you *what* happened but not *why* it happened. Without $KP$, a performer may achieve a good result through poor technique, which is unsustainable and increases the risk of injury or long-term failure.

Define 'Feedback' within the context of physical education.

Feedback is the information a performer receives about their performance, used as a basis for improvement. It is the final component of the basic information processing model, looping back to influence future inputs.

What is 'Kinesthesis' in relation to feedback?

Kinesthesis is the internal sense of the position and movement of body parts. It is a form of intrinsic feedback that allows an athlete to 'feel' if a technique was executed correctly without needing to see the result.

Define 'Constructive Negative Feedback'.

This is negative feedback that identifies an error while simultaneously providing a solution or method for correction. It is used to refine the performance of experienced athletes who are motivated to eliminate technical flaws.

Why do elite performers often value Negative feedback more than beginners do?

Elite performers are typically highly motivated and have a stable skill base, so they view negative feedback as an essential tool for identifying the minor errors that prevent them from achieving perfection. They are less likely to be demotivated by criticism and more focused on the solution.

Library Podcasts

Courses

Referral & Rewards

Evaluating Types of Feedback

Summary

Feedback serves as a critical information loop in skill acquisition, providing performers with data about their actions to facilitate future improvement. By categorizing feedback into distinct types—positive/negative, intrinsic/extrinsic, and results/performance—coaches and athletes can tailor information to match a performer's experience level and psychological needs.

1. Definition & Core Concepts

Feedback is defined as the sensory or external information received by a performer during or after an action that relates directly to the quality or outcome of their performance.

The primary objective of feedback is to bridge the gap between a performer's current state and their desired goal, allowing for the correction of errors and the reinforcement of successful movements.

In the context of the Basic Information Processing Model, feedback serves as the final stage where the output is analyzed to inform future input and decision-making cycles.

2. The Positive-Negative Spectrum

Positive Feedback: This involves recognizing and praising successful execution. It serves to reinforce correct neural pathways and is highly effective for maintaining motivation and confidence, particularly when a performer is learning a new skill.
Negative Feedback: This focuses on identifying incorrect actions or technical errors. For this to be effective, it must be constructive, meaning it identifies the specific error and provides a clear strategy for correction.

While positive feedback encourages the repetition of success, negative feedback is essential for removing deep-seated errors that prevent a performer from reaching elite status.

Feedback Type	Primary Function	Psychological Impact
Positive	Reinforcement of correct action	Increases confidence and motivation
Negative	Correction of technical errors	Can be demotivating if not handled carefully

3. Knowledge of Results vs. Performance

Diagram showing how Knowledge of Results (outcome-focused) and Knowledge of Performance (technique-focused) both feed into the goal of performance improvement.

4. Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Sources

5. Application by Skill Level

6. Exam Strategy & Tips

7. Common Pitfalls & Misconceptions

Evaluating Types of Feedback

Summary

1. Definition & Core Concepts

Feedback is defined as the sensory or external information received by a performer during or after an action that relates directly to the quality or outcome of their performance.

The primary objective of feedback is to bridge the gap between a performer's current state and their desired goal, allowing for the correction of errors and the reinforcement of successful movements.

In the context of the Basic Information Processing Model, feedback serves as the final stage where the output is analyzed to inform future input and decision-making cycles.

2. The Positive-Negative Spectrum

Positive Feedback: This involves recognizing and praising successful execution. It serves to reinforce correct neural pathways and is highly effective for maintaining motivation and confidence, particularly when a performer is learning a new skill.
Negative Feedback: This focuses on identifying incorrect actions or technical errors. For this to be effective, it must be constructive, meaning it identifies the specific error and provides a clear strategy for correction.

While positive feedback encourages the repetition of success, negative feedback is essential for removing deep-seated errors that prevent a performer from reaching elite status.

Feedback Type	Primary Function	Psychological Impact
Positive	Reinforcement of correct action	Increases confidence and motivation
Negative	Correction of technical errors	Can be demotivating if not handled carefully

3. Knowledge of Results vs. Performance

Knowledge of Results ( $KR$ )

This type of feedback focuses exclusively on the outcome or the final statistic of a performance (e.g., the final score or a recorded time).
It is often objective and easy to understand, making it a simple metric for assessing whether a specific goal was met.

Knowledge of Performance ( $KP$ )

This relates to the quality of the movement or the technique used to achieve an outcome, regardless of the final result.
It is more detailed than $KR$ and is vital for correcting the 'how' behind a performance, such as the angle of a joint or the timing of a release.

Key Distinction: A performer could have good $KR$ (winning a race) but poor $KP$ (inefficient running technique), highlighting the need for both types of feedback in comprehensive training.

Diagram showing how Knowledge of Results (outcome-focused) and Knowledge of Performance (technique-focused) both feed into the goal of performance improvement.

4. Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Sources

Intrinsic Feedback: This is the internal information a performer receives from their own senses. This includes kinesthesis (the feel of the muscles and joints) and internal observations of the results of one's own actions.
Extrinsic Feedback: This is information provided by an external source, such as a coach, a crowd's reaction, or a video replay.

The ability to utilize intrinsic feedback is a hallmark of the autonomous stage of learning, where the performer can self-correct without needing constant external input.

Beginners rely heavily on extrinsic feedback because their internal 'feel' for the correct technique is not yet developed, meaning they cannot accurately judge if they have made an error.

5. Application by Skill Level

Selection of feedback type must be aligned with the performer's ability level to ensure it is neither overwhelming nor irrelevant.

Stage	Recommended Feedback	Reasoning
Beginner	Positive & Extrinsic	Builds confidence; provides necessary technical guidance
Elite	Negative & Intrinsic	Allows for fine-tuning of technique; promotes self-reliance

For beginners, $KP$ should be kept simple and focused on one or two key points to avoid information overload. For elite athletes, detailed $KP$ is essential for marginal gains in performance.

6. Exam Strategy & Tips

Justify your choice: When asked to recommend a feedback type, always link it to the performer's ability level (e.g., 'A beginner needs positive feedback to maintain motivation').
Distinguish KR from KP: Use clear terms. $KR$ is about the what happened (result), while $KP$ is about the how it happened (technique).
Identify the source: If the feedback comes from the performer's 'gut feeling' or muscles, it is intrinsic. If it comes from an iPad or a coach, it is extrinsic.

Always check if a question asks for a 'drawing' of the information processing model. Ensure the feedback loop clearly connects the output back to the input/decision-making stages.

7. Common Pitfalls & Misconceptions

Misconception: Negative feedback is always bad. In reality, for elite performers, negative feedback is highly valued as it provides the specific data needed to eliminate minor errors.
Over-reliance: A beginner who only receives extrinsic feedback may never develop the intrinsic 'feel' for the skill, leading to a plateau in their development.
Ignoring KR: While technique ( $KP$ ) is important, ignoring the result ( $KR$ ) can lead to a lack of objective progress tracking.

Knowledge of Results ( $KR$ )

This type of feedback focuses exclusively on the outcome or the final statistic of a performance (e.g., the final score or a recorded time).
It is often objective and easy to understand, making it a simple metric for assessing whether a specific goal was met.

Knowledge of Performance ( $KP$ )

This relates to the quality of the movement or the technique used to achieve an outcome, regardless of the final result.
It is more detailed than $KR$ and is vital for correcting the 'how' behind a performance, such as the angle of a joint or the timing of a release.

Key Distinction: A performer could have good $KR$ (winning a race) but poor $KP$ (inefficient running technique), highlighting the need for both types of feedback in comprehensive training.

Selection of feedback type must be aligned with the performer's ability level to ensure it is neither overwhelming nor irrelevant.

Stage	Recommended Feedback	Reasoning
Beginner	Positive & Extrinsic	Builds confidence; provides necessary technical guidance
Elite	Negative & Intrinsic	Allows for fine-tuning of technique; promotes self-reliance

For beginners, $KP$ should be kept simple and focused on one or two key points to avoid information overload. For elite athletes, detailed $KP$ is essential for marginal gains in performance.

Justify your choice: When asked to recommend a feedback type, always link it to the performer's ability level (e.g., 'A beginner needs positive feedback to maintain motivation').
Distinguish KR from KP: Use clear terms. $KR$ is about the what happened (result), while $KP$ is about the how it happened (technique).
Identify the source: If the feedback comes from the performer's 'gut feeling' or muscles, it is intrinsic. If it comes from an iPad or a coach, it is extrinsic.

Always check if a question asks for a 'drawing' of the information processing model. Ensure the feedback loop clearly connects the output back to the input/decision-making stages.

Misconception: Negative feedback is always bad. In reality, for elite performers, negative feedback is highly valued as it provides the specific data needed to eliminate minor errors.
Over-reliance: A beginner who only receives extrinsic feedback may never develop the intrinsic 'feel' for the skill, leading to a plateau in their development.
Ignoring KR: While technique ( $KP$ ) is important, ignoring the result ( $KR$ ) can lead to a lack of objective progress tracking.

Evaluating Types of Feedback

Summary

1. Definition & Core Concepts

2. The Positive-Negative Spectrum

3. Knowledge of Results vs. Performance

4. Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Sources

5. Application by Skill Level

6. Exam Strategy & Tips

7. Common Pitfalls & Misconceptions

Evaluating Types of Feedback

Summary

1. Definition & Core Concepts

2. The Positive-Negative Spectrum

3. Knowledge of Results vs. Performance

Knowledge of Results (KRKRKR)

Knowledge of Performance (KPKPKP)

4. Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Sources

5. Application by Skill Level

6. Exam Strategy & Tips

7. Common Pitfalls & Misconceptions

Knowledge of Results (KRKRKR)

Knowledge of Performance (KPKPKP)

Knowledge of Results ( $KR$ )

Knowledge of Performance ( $KP$ )

Knowledge of Results ( $KR$ )

Knowledge of Performance ( $KP$ )