Opportunity Sampling: Also known as convenience sampling, this involves selecting individuals who are most easily available and willing to participate at the time of the study.
Volunteer Sampling: Participants actively choose to take part in the research, usually in response to an advertisement, poster, or public request.
Selection Bias: These methods are prone to bias because the sample is not chosen randomly; for example, opportunity samples often consist of people in the same location at the same time.
The following table compares the primary sampling methods based on their impact on research quality:
| Method | Selection Logic | Representativeness | Ease of Use |
|---|---|---|---|
| Random | Equal chance for all | High (in theory) | Difficult (needs full list) |
| Stratified | Proportional sub-groups | Very High | Very Difficult/Time-consuming |
| Systematic | Every person | High | Moderate |
| Opportunity | Convenience | Low (Biased) | Very Easy |
Identify the Population: Always start by defining the target population before evaluating if a sampling method is appropriate for that specific group.
Check for Bias: In exam scenarios, look for 'hidden' biases; for example, systematic sampling can fail if the list has a periodic pattern that matches the sampling interval.
Justify Generalisability: When asked to evaluate a study, link the sampling method directly to whether the results can be applied to the wider world.
Distinguish Random from Haphazard: Never describe opportunity sampling as 'random' just because it seems unplanned; 'random' in research requires a formal mathematical process.
The 'Random' Misconception: Students often think 'random' means 'whoever I run into.' In science, random selection requires a sampling frame where every individual is identified first.
Ignoring Strata Proportions: In stratified sampling, it is a common error to take equal numbers from each group rather than proportional numbers relative to the population.
Volunteer Bias: Be aware that volunteers often share specific personality traits (e.g., being more helpful or highly motivated), which makes the sample unrepresentative of the general public.