These questions focus on the strengths or weaknesses of a specific research technique (e.g., interviews, sampling) when applied to a particular group or topic.
The Methodological Link: It is not enough to state a generic advantage of a method; you must explain why that advantage is particularly relevant to the group being studied.
Practical/Ethical/Theoretical (PET): Use these three lenses to find points of discussion. For example, consider if a method is too expensive (Practical), lacks privacy (Ethical), or lacks validity (Theoretical) for the specific scenario.
| Feature | 4-Mark Question | 12-Mark Question |
|---|---|---|
| Focus | Specific identification and application | Broad discussion and evaluation |
| Structure | One well-developed point linked to an item | Multiple points with counter-arguments |
| AO3 Requirement | Usually none (no evaluation needed) | High (requires critical analysis) |
| Evidence | Must use the provided 'Item' | Uses 'Item' plus external evidence |
Avoid Direct Copying: Never simply transcribe large chunks of the 'Item'. You must interpret the information and rephrase it using conceptual language to earn marks.
The 'One Factor' Rule: If the question asks for 'one factor', do not provide two or three. You will only be marked on the first one you write, and you waste time that could be spent developing that single point to full depth.
Check the Command Word: 'Identify and describe' requires more detail on what something is, while 'Identify and explain' requires more detail on why or how something happens.
Time Management: Aim for approximately 4-6 minutes. If you find yourself writing a full page, you have likely exceeded the requirements for a 4-mark response.