Pairing Rules: When comparing two datasets, you must use the same average and the same measure of spread for both. You cannot validly compare the Range of Group A to the IQR of Group B.
Selection Criteria: If using the Median, the IQR is the most appropriate measure of spread. If using the Mean or Mode, the Range is typically used.
Four-Part Conclusion: A complete statistical comparison requires: (1) Comparing the numerical averages, (2) Interpreting the average in context, (3) Comparing the numerical spreads, and (4) Interpreting the spread in context.
| Feature | Range | Interquartile Range (IQR) |
|---|---|---|
| Calculation | ||
| Sensitivity | High (affected by outliers) | Low (ignores outliers) |
| Data Coverage | 100% of data points | Middle 50% of data points |
| Best Paired With | Mean or Mode | Median |
Use Comparative Language: When writing conclusions, use words like 'higher', 'lower', 'more consistent', or 'less varied'. Avoid just listing the numbers without interpretation.
Check Units: Ensure that your measures of dispersion have the same units as the original data (e.g., cm, dollars, seconds). Range and IQR are linear measures.
Verify Pairings: Always check if the question provides a median; if it does, look for the IQR. If it provides a mean, look for the range. Using the wrong pair often results in lost marks.
Misinterpreting 'Spread': Students often think a 'higher' spread is 'better'. In many contexts (like manufacturing or sports consistency), a lower spread is actually the desired outcome.
Ignoring Sample Size: Small datasets can produce misleading measures of dispersion. A single extreme value in a small sample can drastically inflate the range without representing the true nature of the population.
Confusing Frequency with Data: When data is presented in a frequency table, students often calculate the range of the frequencies rather than the range of the actual data values.