Simple Random Sampling: Every member of the population has an equal probability of selection. This is typically achieved by assigning numbers to individuals and using a random number generator.
Systematic Sampling: Selecting every individual from a list (sampling frame) after a random starting point. The interval is calculated as .
Stratified Sampling: The population is divided into mutually exclusive groups (strata) based on a shared characteristic (e.g., age, gender). A random sample is then taken from each stratum in proportion to its size in the population.
| Feature | Stratified Sampling | Quota Sampling |
|---|---|---|
| Selection | Random (Probability) | Non-random (Non-probability) |
| Sampling Frame | Required | Not required |
| Bias Risk | Low (if done correctly) | High (interviewer choice) |
| Cost/Speed | Higher/Slower | Lower/Faster |
Calculating Stratified Samples: Always use the formula: . Always round to the nearest whole number and check that the sum of your strata equals your total sample size.
Identifying Bias: When asked to evaluate a sampling method, look for 'undercoverage' (groups left out of the frame) or 'self-selection' (volunteers only). If a list is ordered in a pattern (e.g., every 5th person is a manager), warn against using systematic sampling with that same interval.
Justifying Methods: If the population is diverse and you want to ensure all sub-groups are represented, recommend Stratified Sampling. If you lack a list of the population, recommend Quota Sampling.
Confusing Sample and Population: Students often mistake the group they are studying for the population. If you are studying students at one school, the population is 'all students at that school,' not 'all students in the country.'
The 'Random' Misconception: Picking people 'at random' on the street is NOT random sampling in a statistical sense; it is Opportunity Sampling. True random sampling requires a formal process where every member of the sampling frame has a mathematical chance of being picked.
Sample Size Fallacy: While larger samples generally reduce error, a large biased sample is still less useful than a small representative one. Increasing size does not fix fundamental bias in the selection process.