| Command Verb | Requirement | Depth Level |
|---|---|---|
| Identify / State | Provide a brief, factual answer without elaboration. | Low |
| Describe | Provide characteristics, features, or a detailed account. | Medium |
| Explain | Show cause and effect; clarify 'how' or 'why' something happens. | High |
| Evaluate / Justify | Make a judgment based on evidence; weigh pros and cons. | Very High |
The Mark-to-Minute Ratio: Calculate the time available per mark to ensure you do not spend disproportionate time on a single extended response at the expense of the rest of the exam. If a question is worth 10 marks in a 100-mark, 100-minute exam, you should aim to finish it in 10 minutes.
Use of White Space: In technical responses, use clear line breaks between logical steps. This makes it easier for examiners to follow your reasoning and award 'method marks' even if the final numerical answer is incorrect.
Drafting a 'Mini-Plan': For high-value questions (e.g., 6+ marks), jot down 3-4 keywords in the margin before writing. This acts as a mental anchor to ensure you cover all necessary components of the rubric.
The 'Brain Dump' Error: Students often write everything they know about a topic rather than answering the specific question. This results in a 'scattergun' approach that lacks the logical cohesion required for full marks.
Circular Reasoning: This occurs when a student restates the question as the answer (e.g., 'The object moved because it was in motion'). To avoid this, always look for the underlying mechanism or 'the why' behind a phenomenon.
Ignoring the Plural: If a question asks for 'reasons' or 'examples' (plural), providing only one will automatically cap the possible marks, regardless of how detailed that single point is.