| Feature | Criminal Behaviour | Deviant Behaviour |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Violation of codified law | Violation of social norms |
| Sanction | Formal (State-imposed) | Informal (Socially-imposed) |
| Scope | Narrow and specific | Broad and varied |
| Documentation | Recorded in official stats | Rarely documented formally |
Analyze the 'Dark Figure': When discussing the measurement of criminal behaviour, always mention the 'dark figure of crime.' This refers to the gap between crimes committed and crimes recorded in official statistics, which is a critical point for evaluation.
Apply the Two-Part Test: When asked to define a specific crime, always check for both Actus Reus and Mens Rea. If one is missing, explain why the behaviour might not be legally classified as a crime unless it falls under strict liability.
Evaluate Measurement Tools: Be prepared to compare official police statistics with victim surveys. Explain that while police data shows what the state knows, victim surveys often reveal a more accurate 'true' level of criminal behaviour in society.
Equating Morality with Legality: A common mistake is assuming that all immoral acts are crimes. In reality, many acts considered 'wrong' (like lying to a friend) are not criminal, while some technical crimes may not be viewed as immoral by the general public.
Static Definitions: Students often forget that crime is dynamic. Always emphasize that criminal behaviour is a 'moving target' that changes as society moves through different historical and cultural phases.
Intent vs. Outcome: Do not confuse the severity of the outcome with the presence of criminal intent. A tragic accident with a high death toll may not be criminal if there was no negligence or intent, whereas a failed attempt to cause harm can still be a serious crime.