Strength: Clarification: Unlike written questionnaires, the interviewer can explain complex terms or rephrase questions if the participant appears confused, increasing the accuracy of the data.
Strength: High Validity: Unstructured formats allow for the discovery of unexpected information that the researcher might not have thought to ask about initially.
Weakness: Social Desirability Bias: Participants may alter their answers to appear more favorable to the interviewer, especially in face-to-face settings where they might feel judged.
Weakness: Analysis Difficulty: Qualitative data from unstructured interviews is time-consuming to transcribe and analyze, as it cannot be easily converted into numerical statistics.
Replication is Key: If an exam question asks about the benefit of structured interviews, always mention reliability and the ability for other researchers to repeat the exact procedure.
Distinguish Bias: Be careful not to confuse social desirability bias (wanting to look good) with demand characteristics (trying to guess the aim of the study).
Structure vs. Question Type: Remember that 'structured' refers to the order and consistency of questions, not whether the questions themselves are open or closed.
Check for Generalisability: Always consider if the small sample size typical of interviews limits the ability to apply findings to the wider population.