Random Sampling: Every member of the target population has an equal mathematical chance of being selected. This is typically achieved using random number generators or lottery systems, and it is the 'gold standard' for minimizing selection bias.
Opportunity (Convenience) Sampling: Researchers select participants who are easily available at the time of the study, such as people walking past in a public space. While highly efficient and low-cost, it often results in a biased sample that lacks generalizability.
Self-Selected (Volunteer) Sampling: Participants choose to join the study themselves, often in response to an advertisement or public appeal. This method is useful for reaching specific groups but suffers from 'volunteer bias', where the sample consists only of highly motivated individuals.
Population vs. Sample: The population is the theoretical group of interest (e.g., all voters), while the sample is the actual group measured (e.g., 1,000 surveyed voters).
Parameter vs. Statistic: A parameter is a numerical value describing a population (e.g., population mean ), whereas a statistic is a numerical value calculated from a sample (e.g., sample mean ).
| Feature | Random Sampling | Opportunity Sampling | Self-Selected Sampling |
|---|---|---|---|
| Selection Basis | Chance/Randomness | Availability | Volunteering |
| Bias Risk | Very Low | High (Selection Bias) | High (Volunteer Bias) |
| Generalizability | High | Low | Low |
Identify the Scope: When analyzing a study, always identify the 'Target Population' first. If the conclusion of the study claims to apply to 'all teenagers' but the sample was only 'students from one school', the study lacks generalizability.
Check for Bias: Look for how participants were recruited. If they were recruited via a social media post, consider 'volunteer bias'; if they were recruited in a library, consider 'opportunity bias' (e.g., they might be more studious than the average person).
Sample Size Matters: In exam questions, if a sample size is very small (e.g., ), mention that individual differences may have a disproportionate effect, making the data less reliable for the wider population.