| Concept | The Rapoports (Diversity) | Functionalism (Nuclear Norm) |
|---|---|---|
| Norm | No single dominant norm | The Nuclear Family is the universal norm |
| View of Change | Positive; reflects choice and adaptation | Negative; indicates social breakdown or dysfunction |
| Terminology | 'Families' (Plural) | 'The Family' (Singular) |
Definition Check: When asked about family diversity, always list all five types. Missing one (like 'cohort' or 'life-course') is a common way to lose marks.
Evaluative Balance: In essays, use the Rapoports to criticize functionalist views of the 'cereal packet family', but then use Chester or Feminist critiques to balance your argument.
Application: If provided with a case study of a family changing over time, apply the Life-course diversity label to show you can link theory to scenarios.
Link to Postmodernism: The Rapoports' work is a precursor to Postmodernist ideas. You can mention that their findings support the idea of 'pick and mix' identities and family structures.
The 'Race Only' Error: Many students mistakenly think 'diversity' only refers to cultural or ethnic differences. Remember that social class and historical timing (cohort) are equally important types in the Rapoports' model.
Confusion with 'Alternatives': Do not confuse family diversity with 'alternatives to the family' (like living alone or in communes). Family diversity describes different ways of being a family unit.
Overstating the Change: While diversity is high, many people still spend a significant portion of their lives in a nuclear-style arrangement. Don't claim the nuclear family has 'vanished' entirely.
Postmodernism (Beck & Giddens): The idea of the 'negotiated family' where individuals choose roles based on their needs directly builds upon the Rapoports' findings.
Social Policy: Changes in law (e.g., Divorce Reform, Civil Partnership Acts) have facilitated the growth of the diversity the Rapoports identified.
Feminism: Some feminists argue that even in 'diverse' families, traditional gender roles often persist, challenging the idea that all diversity is a sign of progress.