| Feature | Critical Response | Empathic Response |
|---|---|---|
| Perspective | Objective, third-person analysis of the text. | Subjective, first-person 'voice' of a character. |
| Evidence | Direct quotations and formal citations. | Textual 'echoes' and specific details woven into the narrative. |
| Primary Goal | To analyze the writer's methods and themes. | To demonstrate insight into a character's mindset at a specific moment. |
| Tone | Academic and evaluative. | Authentic and creative, yet grounded in the text. |
Focus on the Prompt: Every sentence should contribute to answering the specific question; avoid irrelevant background information or 'filler' introductions.
Avoid Feature-Spotting: Simply identifying a literary technique (e.g., 'the author uses a simile') earns no marks without an explanation of why it was used and what effect it creates.
The 'So What?' Test: For every point made, the student should ask if they have explained the significance of that point in relation to the overall theme or character development.
Narrative vs. Analysis: A common mistake is re-telling the story (narrative) rather than explaining how the story is constructed (analysis). Narrative summaries do not receive high marks.
Generic Topic Sentences: Avoid vague statements like 'The writer uses language to create interest.' Instead, be specific: 'The writer uses harsh plosive sounds to mirror the character's internal aggression.'
Ignoring Form and Structure: Many students focus only on language (words); high-level responses must also consider structure (the order of events) and form (the genre-specific conventions).