Identify Speaker and Context: Begin by noting who says the quotation and the precise moment it occurs in the play. Consider the immediate situation, the characters present, and any preceding events that might influence the dialogue.
Analyze Key Words and Phrases: Focus on specific vocabulary, imagery, or rhetorical devices used within the quotation. For example, a character's repeated use of possessive pronouns like "my" or "mine" might highlight their individualism or possessiveness.
Examine Tone and Delivery: Although a play is read, consider how the line would be spoken on stage—with anger, sarcasm, fear, or sincerity. Stage directions often provide clues, but inferring tone is crucial for grasping the full emotional and psychological impact of the words.
Connect to Character and Theme: Link the insights gained from linguistic analysis back to the character's overall personality, their arc throughout the play, and the broader thematic concerns Priestley explores. Explain how the quotation contributes to our understanding of these elements.
Consider Authorial Purpose: Reflect on why Priestley chose this particular character to say these words at this specific moment. What message is he trying to convey to the audience about society, morality, or human nature through this piece of dialogue?
Direct Quotations: These are the character's own spoken words, offering immediate and unfiltered (though potentially unreliable) insight into their thoughts, feelings, and beliefs. They are powerful because they allow the audience to hear the character's voice directly, such as Eric's emotional confession in Act III.
Stage Directions: Priestley's stage directions provide crucial indirect character revelation, describing a character's appearance, demeanor, or actions. For example, the initial description of Sybil Birling as "a rather cold woman and her husband’s superior" shapes our initial perception before she even speaks.
Dialogue from Other Characters: What other characters say about an individual also contributes to indirect characterization. Gerald's initial praise of Sheila's beauty, for instance, highlights the superficial values of their social circle and how women were often judged by appearance.
Evaluating Reliability: While direct quotations are powerful, their reliability must be assessed; a character might be lying, self-deceiving, or speaking under duress. Indirect methods, like stage directions, often offer a more objective, author-guided perspective on a character's true nature.
Select Relevant Quotations: Choose quotations that are directly pertinent to the question and offer rich opportunities for analysis, rather than simply summarizing plot points. Prioritize quotes that reveal character development, thematic arguments, or Priestley's specific social commentary.
Integrate Smoothly: Embed quotations seamlessly into your sentences, avoiding simply dropping them in. Use introductory phrases or integrate parts of the quote to maintain flow and demonstrate sophisticated textual engagement.
Prioritize Analysis over Length: A short, well-analyzed quotation is far more effective than a long, unexamined one. Focus on dissecting specific words, phrases, and their implications, explaining how they support your argument about character or theme.
Link to Wider Play: Always connect your analysis of a specific quotation back to the character's overall arc, the play's major themes, and Priestley's broader intentions. Show how this single moment contributes to the play's cumulative impact.
Consider Dramatic Effect: For a play, think about the impact of the quotation on the audience. Does it evoke sympathy, anger, shock, or understanding? How does Priestley use this dialogue to manipulate audience perception or convey his message?
Mere Paraphrasing: A common mistake is to simply rephrase the quotation in your own words without offering deeper analysis. Effective analysis explains why the character says what they say, how their language works, and what it reveals beyond the surface meaning.
Lack of Context: Presenting a quotation without explaining its dramatic context can lead to misinterpretation and weaken your argument. Always briefly establish the 'who, what, when, and where' of the quotation.
Over-quoting: Using too many long quotations can make an essay feel disjointed and suggest a reliance on the text rather than independent analysis. Select concise, impactful phrases and integrate them strategically.
Ignoring Subtext: Characters in "An Inspector Calls" often say one thing but mean another, or their words carry unspoken implications. Failing to recognize subtext, dramatic irony, or sarcasm can lead to a superficial understanding of the dialogue.
Generic Analysis: Applying generic literary analysis terms without specific reference to the quotation's content or Priestley's purpose is ineffective. Ensure your analysis is tailored to the unique elements of the chosen quotation and its role in the play.
Cumulative Impact: Individual character quotations, when analyzed together, build a powerful cumulative argument for Priestley's social and political message. For example, contrasting Arthur Birling's capitalist rhetoric with the Inspector's socialist pronouncements reveals the core ideological conflict of the play.
Didactic Purpose: Priestley uses the characters' dialogue to teach his audience about social responsibility and the consequences of unchecked individualism. Analyzing how different characters articulate or resist these lessons helps to understand the play's didactic purpose.
Critique of Society: Many quotations serve as direct or indirect critiques of Edwardian society's class structure, gender inequalities, and moral failings. By examining the language used by characters like Sybil Birling, one can see how Priestley exposes hypocrisy and prejudice.
Call to Action: The Inspector's final speech, composed of powerful and moralistic quotations, acts as a direct call to action for the audience to embrace collective responsibility. Understanding the rhetorical force of these lines is key to grasping Priestley's ultimate message.