| Feature | CT | MRI | fMRI | PET |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measures | X‑ray absorption | Magnetic signals | Oxygenation changes | Radioactive tracer activity |
| Shows | Structure | Structure | Structure + Function | Function + Metabolism |
| Radiation? | Yes | No | No | Yes (low‑dose) |
| Best for | Rapid emergency scans | Soft‑tissue detail | Real‑time activity | Metabolic dysfunction |
Clarify whether structural or functional information is required before selecting the appropriate technique. Structural questions usually point to CT or MRI, while functional questions suggest fMRI or PET.
Check modality limitations, such as MRI incompatibility with metal implants. Examiners often expect you to recognise safety constraints when choosing between techniques.
Link brain regions to symptoms when interpreting scan results. Many exam questions require inferring function from the site of observed abnormality.
Recall radiation risks associated with CT and PET. Questions may ask which technique is most suitable for children or pregnant patients, requiring awareness of exposure considerations.
Confusing MRI with fMRI is a common error. MRI provides detailed structure, whereas fMRI is used for real‑time functional activity; students often mix them due to similar terminology.
Assuming PET is purely anatomical is incorrect. PET primarily measures metabolic activity, which may not map perfectly onto anatomical structures visible in CT or MRI.
Believing fMRI measures electrical activity directly overlooks its reliance on blood‑flow changes, which lag behind neural firing by several seconds.
Thinking CT scans are always dangerous exaggerates radiation concerns. While exposure is higher than typical X‑rays, the risk remains low and justified in many medical contexts.
Integration with behavioural studies enhances understanding of cognition. Functional methods combined with psychological tasks allow researchers to map mental processes onto neural circuits.
Advances in machine learning improve image interpretation. Algorithms increasingly assist clinicians in detecting subtle abnormalities or predicting disease progression based on scan data.
Comparisons with electrophysiological techniques highlight complementary strengths. While EEG captures rapid electrical changes, fMRI provides superior spatial mapping, making combined use valuable in research.
Applications in personalised medicine use imaging to guide targeted therapies, such as identifying tumour boundaries before surgery or tailoring treatments based on metabolic patterns.